Talk:Dark (TV series)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dark (TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dark (TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Season 1 family tree…
[edit]Can we either add some kind of warning that the season 1 family tree has spoilers for season 1 and should not be looked at until after watching season 1, or add a “pre season 1” no-spoilers family tree? 185.241.227.184 (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Spoiler warnings are no longer used on Wikipedia. Please see WP:SPOILER and WP:DISCLAIM for more information. --Noahfgodard (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Family trees
[edit]@Account for test: Per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF, I think the inclusion of any family trees risk giving undue weight to in-universe information, and especially given that the family trees in this article are fan-created and unreferenced, they may be inappropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia. (Articles like Tolkien's Middle-earth family trees, on the other hand, discuss family trees from a real-world perspective.) Even if the family trees remain in the article, I think the diagram under Main characters' relationships through time should be removed. It's difficult to read and understand (due to a lack of labelling/clarity, the rotated text, the unnecessary background, etc.), and is largely a redundant restatement of information provided in the previous family trees. If the family trees in general don't give undue weight to in-universe information, this one certainly does. I'd like to hear other editors' opinions before removing it again, but I don't think it belongs in a Wikipedia article. --Noahfgodard (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Agree for sure on the circular diagram with the unnecessary background... definitely too fan-site-y for Wikipedia. —Joeyconnick (talk) 06:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Novels
[edit]Came here looking for information on the novels related to the series (seen on Amazon). I think these should be included if a source talking about them can be found. Ike9898 (talk) 17:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Wrong Hans Diehl linked
[edit]Somebody linked a random nutritionist instead 71.182.194.153 (talk) 03:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)